Two systems of football argumentation: pass control or counter - attack is more reliable

The two systems are now the two most popular in the big five, with Pep Guardiola as the leading player in passing and control, while Carlo Ancenotti and Juergen Klopp are the best at counter-attacking. So, is it better to pass or counter? Consequentialism: Counter-insurgency is more likely to yield results It goes without saying that Real Madrid under Ancenotti have quickly returned to the form of the Cristiano Ronaldo era, as evidenced by last season's Champions League triumph. Can only say, Real Madrid, such a team and good at defensive tactics, should be the best combination. Although he uses the idea of counter-attacking, unlike the dull effect of other coaches, the Italian style of defence can often present a wonderful picture of the game.La Liga table. A reference to his success in five major leagues shows that although he has always stuck to the 4-4-2 formation, Ancelotti's counter-attacking tactics are varied and flexible. Because of this, it is easier for Ancenotti to lead the team in the short term to achieve immediate results. The team coach versus the plug and play coach Guardiola's greatest contribution to a team is building, for example, like laying a foundation. This is a project that demands pragmatism and intense focus, so why would he not be sacked even if he did not win the Champions League? The fundamental reason is that the foundations of the city he has built are very solid, which is the biggest guarantee for a long campaign. It is also commendable that City's boss understands that the league is the first test of results, with the Champions League the icing on the cake. There is another symbol of resistance, Jrgen Klopp. Seven years on, Liverpool are showing signs of exhaustion. He has taken Liverpool to new heights but has failed to lay a solid foundation. Lose two more games and Klopp's dismissal is inevitable. Some people say that the only requirement for a player is physical strength, but it is not. Not only is the physical condition of the hard condition, in fact, more tests of the player's tactical thinking. Of course, pass and control play is more about small skills and concentration, and physical demands seem to come last. Guardiola has remained stubbornly committed to his footballing ideals but has never proved himself in the Champions League since leaving Barcelona. The reason is that this set of play for the key position of the player is too harsh. Xavi, Messi, such world-class players, how many? I always thought that if Manchester City had one more de Braun, Blue Moon would have won the Champions League. Conclusion: It is hard to say which of these two tactics is better, but it can only be assessed as follows: the counterattack is more widely used and more effective; and the pass control system can make a team's results more stable.